The trial against The Pirate Bay has started in Stockholm, Sweden are one of the most important issues of our time. Our adversaries basically wants to close down internets and remodel it into something similar of a sodamachine serving entertainment. During the trial, the prosecutor together with a coterie of representatives for a disabled business model will put up a tacky theater by telling stories designed to convince the court that The Pirate Bay in fact is a menace to society.
What differs this trial from most earlier trials is that everything in and surrounding it will whirl round and round in diverse channels of communication; to be discussed, reinterpreted, copied and critizised. Every crack in their appeal will be penetrated by the gaze of thousands upon thousands of eyes on the internets, in all the channels covering the trial. Old cliches from the antipiracy lobby wont stick. You won’t be able to say stuff like, ”you can’t compete with free” or ”filesharing is theft” without a thousand voices making fun of you.
We will create numerous scenes where quite different plays will take place. In local channels like spectrial.bloggy.se where the immediate physical surroundings of the court are being discussed. ”Which cafés nearby will give us connection?” ”How can we get electricity to the bus?” But also in international channels like Twitter, where right now the torrent of information is being translated into fifteen different languages. Translations and coverage being made by ordinary users of internets. Volunteers sign up to make trial-tourist guides to the surroundings, drive the bus or hook up audio. People fly in from far away countries to cover the trial and tell the world their video story of the Sweden they see.
Here all participants are potential actors in the Spectrial. Our channels form a meltingpot of reporting and engagement.
Our communication around the spectacle aims in no way towards an objective report on an external chain of events. Rather, the trial is a hub around which a whole new network of actors is instigated. Neither is the spectacle a question of old media against digital, social medias. Our social medias include a paper fanzine and a 32 year old bus, connecting us and others physically.
It’s not about the protocols nor the technology. It’s about using these to create new congregations, where anyone is invited and anyone can find their role, build new scenes and make their own performances.
The future is built by us. Us who participate in conversations. The future is built by us who explore how information and performativity is coming together. To refuse a debate and still expect to be able to charge consumers is since long a closed door. To also try and outlaw certain types of conversations is downright disgraceful.
The coverage of the trial is not unique in these qualities. More and more areas see the creation of conversations on and the exploration of new stances on culture and cultural economy. A gigantic collective exploration has set sails. Every route differs from the other. But they have one thing in common: The industry interests that the state is representing are never present in these conversations. This is why they wont be part in building the future.
maintain hardline kopimi
The Bureau for Piracy and The Pirate Bay
via the internets
this article was translated and published by proud peers of The Pirate Bay
trial.thepiratebay.org
Here is a thought, today, on my way home from work I saw a woman with a bag from Sony Ericsson Mobile, with…a Napster Logo. Oh, the irony.
Yoost already commercializes Torrent(like) Technology for online broadcasting. Sopcast, TVAnts and TVu (and all their cousins) are not far behind.
Most major TV stations already provide live streams, plus after the premiere-broadcasting on their sites (On Fox, CBS, and NBS as well as on CTV.ca since a little while now you can whach the last Episodes of your favorite show the day after they are aired) . Several Software companies already use Torrents to distribute their software and Updates and Service packs…anyway.
Metro Goldwyn Meyer announced not too long ago that their entire back catalog will be available in it’ entirety on a rather well known video sharing site.
This is yet again an attempt by industry to hijack a already widely accepted and used technology…to try and commercialize it, inadvertently killing off and then, 10 years later, make bags with its logo on it. Oh and off course, to emulate the feel of torrent-use, like Napster is emulated by iTunes with locked files and still only money for the ‘organized’ recording industry.
this is a sad, sad fact…